Palatability of Crushed Over-the-Counter Medications.

CONTEXT: Dysphagia is a common concern, especially in the last several days of life. Medications are often crushed for ease of administration for individuals with swallowing difficulty. OBJECTIVES: To assess palatability of commonly used crushed over-the-counter (OTC) medications. A secondary objective is to evaluate pharmacist knowledge and opinions of crushing medications. METHODS: Pharmacist participants sampled crushed OTC medications and completed presampling and postsampling surveys about crushing medications. Participants were excluded for current smoking or tobacco use, pregnancy, allergy to any study medication or applesauce, or potential drug-drug interaction with study medications. Eight OTC medications were crushed and mixed in applesauce: naproxen, fexofenadine, phenazopyridine, multivitamin, loperamide, famotidine, sennosides, and sennosides-docusate. Participants were blinded to medication samples and control (plain applesauce). Samples were rated from one (least palatable) to five (most palatable). Investigators recorded participants' comments, behaviors, and facial expressions during sampling. RESULTS: Nineteen volunteers completed the study. Most participants rated three samples as not palatable (score of two or less): fexofenadine, 16 (84%); loperamide, 13 (68%); and sennosides-docusate, 16 (84%). All participants rated famotidine and sennosides palatable. The percentage of participants who would consider palatability in recommendations for crushing medications increased from 47% prestudy to 79% poststudy. CONCLUSION: Palatability should be considered when recommending crushed medications. Survey responses indicate that pharmacists' opinions of crushed medications changed after this palatability experiment. Clinicians should evaluate the appropriateness of all medications when dysphagia is a concern and deprescribe medications when appropriate to reduce burden for patients and caregivers.

Guidance for Safe and Appropriate Use of Antibiotics in Hospice Using a Collaborative Decision Support Tool.

Infections often impact care of hospice patients; however, limited guidance exists for end-of-life infection management. Regardless of patient prognosis, appropriate antibiotic use is necessary for maintaining quality of life. Antibiotics may be associated with serious adverse events, posing safety risks to patients that should be factored into the appropriateness determination. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics are prescribed frequently in hospice. There are 8 fluoroquinolone drug safety warnings regarding risk for serious adverse events communicated by the US Food and Drug Administration. A retrospective chart review at a hospice pharmacy services provider identified decedents who used a fluoroquinolone during a 1-month period. Charts were evaluated for the presence of risk factors for serious adverse events, including advanced age (86.0%), orders for multiple QTc prolongation risk medications (51.5%), hypertension (64.1%), and concomitant corticosteroids (22.9%). Findings demonstrate notable risk with the use of at least 1 class of antibiotics in a hospice population. STAMPS is a hospice decision support tool, developed to guide symptom-driven antibiotic use that incorporates safety assessment and individual goals of care into infection management planning. The tool can also serve as a framework for patient-centered communications about appropriate antibiotic use in hospice between providers, patients, and families.

State Legislation to Prevent Diversion of Opioids in Hospice Programs: A Deeper Look Into Ohio Law.

The problem of opioid diversion and its contribution to the opioid epidemic are well known nationally, existing even within hospice care. Proper disposal of opioids may be a critical factor in reducing diversion. In 2014, Ohio implemented legislation requiring a hospice employee to destroy or witness disposal of all unused opioids within a patient's plan of care. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of Ohio Revised Code 3712.062 on hospice programs' policies and procedures to prevent opioid diversion in the home. Directors of Ohio-licensed hospices were surveyed to assess the percentage of programs with a written policy in place for disposal of opioids and to calculate a compliance score based on responses to survey questions assessing compliance with legislation components. Fifty-two surveys were completed (39.4%). All survey respondents reported having a written policy in place. A 95.5% average compliance score was calculated, with the largest disparity occurring with timing of opioid disposal. While Ohio Revised Code 3712.062 requires opioid disposal at the time of patient's death or when no longer needed by the patient, only 84% of respondents report disposing opioids upon discontinuation. Overall, a high compliance rate was seen among hospice programs indicating such regulation is manageable to meet.

Evaluation of QTc Interval Prolongation Among Patients With Cancer Using Enteral Methadone.

CONTEXT:: The effect of methadone on corrected QT interval (QTc) in patients with cancer pain is not well-known. OBJECTIVES:: To describe and characterize the effect of low-, moderate-, and high-dose enteral methadone on QTc interval in patients with cancer. METHODS:: Retrospective cohort study including patients prescribed enteral methadone during the 27-month study period. Participants were divided into 3 methadone daily dose groups: <30 (low dose), 30 to 59 (moderate dose), ≥60 (high dose) mg. The primary outcome was the incidence of QTc prolongation (>450 ms for females and >430 ms for males). Secondary outcomes included the magnitude of change in QTc after starting methadone, the incidence of clinically significant QTc prolongation (>500 ms) and the prevalence of torsades de pointes and syncope. RESULTS:: Two hundred three patients met study inclusion criteria: 91 (45%) low dose, 52 (26%) moderate dose, and 60 (29%) high dose. Incidence of QTc prolongation for low-, moderate-, and high-dose groups was 50 (55%), 37 (71%), and 43 (72%), respectively ( P = .039, low vs high dose). Incidence of clinically significant QTc prolongation was 10 (11%), 4 (8%), and 7 (12%) for low-, moderate-, and high-dose groups. For patients without QTc prolongation prior to initiating methadone, 62% of moderate-dose patients and 67% of high-dose patients had QTc prolongation, while taking methadone. CONCLUSION:: This study found a notably high incidence of QTc prolongation in patients with cancer using enteral methadone. Future studies should aim to determine the risk of adverse cardiac effects in the cancer population and determine appropriate monitoring of methadone for pain management.

A Survey of Hospice and Palliative Care Physicians Regarding Palliative Sedation Practices.

CONTEXT: Patients nearing the end of life may experience symptoms that are refractory to standard therapeutic options. Physicians may consider palliative sedation to relieve intolerable suffering. There is limited clinical literature regarding preferred medications for palliative sedation. OBJECTIVES: To determine the preferred medications physicians use when implementing palliative sedation. METHODS: An Internet-based, cross-sectional survey of hospice and palliative care physicians in the United States. RESULTS: A link to the survey was e-mailed to 3130 physician members of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, of which 381 physicians completed the survey. Physicians were not required to answer all questions. Nearly all (n = 335, 99%) respondents indicated that palliative sedation may be used (acceptable by 73% [n = 248] for refractory symptoms and acceptable by 26% [n = 87] only for imminently dying patients). Seventy-nine percent (n = 252) believed that opioids should not be used to induce palliative sedation but should be continued to provide pain control. Midazolam was the most commonly selected first-line choice for palliative sedation (n = 155, 42%). The most commonly reported second-line agents for the induction of palliative sedation were lorazepam, midazolam (for those who did not select midazolam as first-line agent), and phenobarbital with a reported preference of 20% (n = 49), 19% (n = 46), and 17% (n = 40), respectively. CONCLUSION: Of the physicians surveyed, 99% (n = 335) felt that palliative sedation is a reasonable treatment modality. Midazolam was considered a drug of choice for inducing and maintaining sedation, and opioids were continued for pain control.

Petroleum jelly (vaseline balls) for the treatment of constipation: a survey of hospice and palliative care practitioners.

Constipation is a common symptom at end of life, impacting patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Hospice and palliative care professionals often use practices based on anecdotal evidence. One such intervention is an oral preparation of petroleum jelly (OPJ), referred to as "Vaseline balls." This survey was designed to collect information regarding healthcare practitioners' knowledge and attitudes toward the use of OPJ for the management of constipation in hospice and palliative care. An online survey was distributed to physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, and pharmacists who work with hospice and palliative care patients. A total of 67% (n=237/353) of responders reported being familiar with the use of OPJ. Results indicate there is a need for further clinical research on the use of OPJ to guide practice.

Medication appropriateness at end of life: a new tool for balancing medicine and communication for optimal outcomes--the BUILD model.

The BUILD model was created to provide a systematic framework for hospice clinicians to have important conversations with patients and families as well as facilitating useful conversations with interdisciplinary teammates. Although this article focuses on medication appropriateness and discontinuation of medications, this model can also be used when discussing prognosis, code status, goals of care, drug diversion, and when collaborating to develop a plan of care. When provided with a communication tool that is versatile, logical, and effective, hospice clinicians may use it, supporting improved patient care outcomes.

Chlorpromazine bioavailability from a topical gel formulation in volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Symptom management medications are often compounded into topical gel formulations providing an alternative route of administration for hospice and palliative care patients. Though commonly used, transdermal absorption and bioavailability studies of these gel products are lacking. Chlorpromazine was studied because it is FDA approved for treatment of nausea and vomiting and is used off-label for treatment of agitation and delirium. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine the transdermal absorption of chlorpromazine PLO gel in healthy adults. METHODS: Twenty-five milligrams of chlorpromazine in PLO gel was applied to 10 subjects' wrists and 100 mg was applied to 1 subject's wrist. Blood draws were completed preapplication and 1, 2, and 4 hours postapplication. This single-center unblinded study recruited healthy adults between 18 and 70 years of age. Participants were not pregnant, did not have an allergy to any component of the study medication, and were not taking a phenothiazine medication. RESULTS: Chlorpromazine was undetected in any of the 11 subjects' blood samples. LIMITATIONS: There is an assumption of equivalent medication absorption in healthy patients and palliative care or hospice patients. CONCLUSION: Rapid relief of symptoms at end of life is essential. Chlorpromazine in PLO gel may not be an effective treatment option since blood levels were undetectable at 1, 2, and 4 hours after topical application.

Medication costs across the hospice stay: an evaluation of medication costs in response to the MedPAC proposed reimbursement model.

The Medicare Payment Advisory Committee (MedPAC) recommended that the per diem reimbursement for the Medicare Hospice Benefit change to a U-shaped scheme reflecting spending based on nursing visit frequency. This study investigated the change in drug cost over patients' length of stay (LOS) as current drug cost trends are unknown and were not evaluated in the MedPAC proposed reimbursement scheme. An analysis of patient utilizers of a national pharmacy claims database from 2007 to 2010 was completed to determine the trend in average daily pharmaceutical cost per utilizer (PCPU) over the patient's LOS. The average daily PCPU for 144,119 patients demonstrated a U-shaped curve. Indexed values in the first and last periods were significantly higher than in all other periods overall and by diagnosis (P < .001). Although indexed medication costs showed a U-shaped curve, it is imperative that hospice reimbursement be adequately evaluated for all medication costs including variations within the diagnosis mix. Payer sources and hospices must work together to determine adequate reimbursement models that will provide patients with effective and efficient high-quality care through the end of life.

Evaluation of atropine 1% ophthalmic solution administered sublingually for the management of terminal respiratory secretions.

Terminal respiratory secretions (TRS) or "death rattle" is a common symptom in the dying patient. Current practice for the prevention and treatment of TRS involves the use of oral, sublingual, transdermal, or parenteral anticholinergic medications. A retrospective chart review of patients admitted to a hospice inpatient unit for terminal care and treated with sublingual atropine 1% ophthalmic drops for TRS was conducted. A total of 19 of 22 patients treated with atropine had documented reduction or resolution of TRS. This study suggests that atropine 1% ophthalmic drops administered sublingually are a reasonable option for the management of TRS. Problematic cardiac or central nervous system symptoms were not found in the present study. Results should aid hospice programs who are seeking guidance on the management of TRS with atropine 1% ophthalmic drops.